Plenty Horses
-2.jpg)
Plenty Horses (Tasunka) (b. 1869) was a Sicangu (Brulé) Lakota from the Rosebud Indian Reservation. On January 7, 1891, eight days after the Wounded Knee Massacre, he shot and killed Army Lieutenant Edward W. Casey,[1] commandant of the Cheyenne Scouts (designated Troop L, Eighth Cavalry) two miles north of the Stronghold Table in the Badlands of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota. Plenty Horses – who was present at the Drexel Mission Fight the day after the Wounded Knee Massacre, was arrested for the murder and his case went to trial. His defense was he shot and killed Casey as an effort to redeem himself in the eyes of his people after having spent five years at the Carlisle Indian School learning the ways of the white man. He returned in time to be present on the reservation during the massacre.
Five years I attended Carlisle and was educated in the ways of the white man. When I returned to my people, I was an outcast among them. I was no longer an Indian. I was not a white man. I was lonely. I shot the lieutenant so I might make a place for myself among my people. I am now one of them. I shall be hung, and the Indians will bury me as a warrior.[2]
The trial of Plenty Horses, which took place at Fort Meade near Sturgis, figured prominently into the investigation of the events surrounding the Wounded Knee Massacre specifically as to whether or not Spotted Elk's band were considered to be prisoners of war. The central argument of Plenty Horse's two lawyers George Nock and David Powers- both working pro bono, was that a state of war existed between the United States and the Lakota Nation and as such the belligerents may kill each other without threat of criminal penalty. In such case Plenty Horses should not be tried for murder. If the prosecution's argument that a state of war did not exist between the Lakota and the United States held true, his lawyers argued that the soldiers involved with the killings at Wounded Knee should also be charged with murder.
It was in the governments' interest that the victims of Wounded Knee be considered as combatants who were prisoners of war who rose up in armed resistance. On May 28, 1891 George Shiras, Jr. the presiding judge in the case halted the proceedings and instructed the jury to find that a state of war did exist around the time of the killing between the Lakota and the United States and that the skirmishes between the Lakota warriors and the U.S. Army were actually battles. As Judge Shiras stated on record; "If they were not it would be hard to justify the killings of the Indians at Wounded Knee and other places".
General Nelson Miles would state publicly that a state of war did exist at the time. He called as a witness by the defense attorneys, Captain Frank D. Baldwin a member of Mile's staff was already in the state having gone to Pierre to urge the governor to ban the sale of weapons to Indians which the legislature had failed to do.
Baldwin appeared as a surprise witness at the trial. Baldwins testimony supported the main assertion of the defense; that Plenty Horses had killed Casey as the officer was spying on the Indian encampment on the Stronghold Table.[3]
As a result of the finding that a state of war did exist Plenty Horses escaped conviction for murder and was released, thereby exonerating the soldiers of the Seventh Cavalry the perpetrators of the Wounded Knee Massacre, none of whom were ever charged.[4]
Notes
- ↑ Congressional edition By United States. Congress p.132
- ↑ Marty Gitlin: Wounded Knee Massacre p.97; Greenwood (2010) ISBN 978-1-59884-409-2
- ↑ Robert Lee:Fort Meade and the Black Hills p.135, University of Nebraska Press (1991) ISBN 978-0-8032-7961-2
- ↑ Gary D. Solis: The law of armed conflict: international humanitarian law in war p.33; Cambridge University Press; (2010);ISBN 0-521-87088-7
Bibliography
- Roger L. Di Silvestro: In the Shadow of Wounded Knee: The Untold Final Story of the Indian Wars
- EDWARD S. ELLIS, M.A: THE PEOPLES STANDARD HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES