Gnosticism and the New Testament

Gnosticism and the New Testament is the connection between the Christian sects, described by Irenaeus (c.180) and other writers as gnostikos, and the New Testament, and also the use of the New Testament in the Nag Hammadi texts (c.300-400).

Terminology

According to St. Hippolytus of Rome, the term "Gnostic" was used by a group of ascetic philosophers who combined Plato's philosophy with ancient mystery religions and stories from the books and letters now included in the Bible.[1] The term was later used by Henry More in a commentary on the seven letters of the Book of Revelation, where More used the term "Gnosticisme" to describe the heresy in Thyatira.[2] The term is derived from the use of the Greek adjective gnostikos ("learned", "intellectual", Greek γνωστικός) by Irenaeus (c. 185 AD) to describe the school of Valentinus as he legomene gnostike haeresis "the heresy called Learned (gnostic)".[3]

Gnosticism

Main article: Gnosticism

The Gnostics were a rather diverse group of early movements finding a basis often in Christianity or Judaism. These people did not refer to themselves as "Gnostics" but rather the label was applied mostly by their opponents and modern scholars.

Irenaeus wrote a five-volume book (On the Detection and Overthrow of the So-Called Gnosis commonly referred to as Against Heresies).

The Valentians' use of the New Testament

It is not clear how many of the sects treated by Irenaeus in On the Detection and Overthrow of Knowledge Falsely So Called he actually considers to be gnostikos, but Valentinus is specifically named as gnostikos. Irenaeus describes how the Valentinians claim to find evidence in Ephesians for their characteristic belief in the existence of the Æons as supernatural beings:

Paul also, they affirm, very clearly and frequently names these Æons, and even goes so far as to preserve their order, when he says, “To all the generations of the Æons of the Æon.” (Ephesians 3:21) Nay, we ourselves, when at the giving of thanks we pronounce the words, “To Æons of Æons” (for ever and ever), do set forth these Æons. And, in fine, wherever the words Æon or Æons occur, they at once refer them to these beings.
— On the Detection and Overthrow of Knowledge Falsely So Called Book 1. Ch.3

Gnostic interpretations of Paul's teachings

St. Paul, Valentin de Boulogne

The followers of Valentinius attempted to systematically decode the Epistles, claiming that most Christians made the mistake of reading the Epistles literally rather than allegorically. Valentians understood the conflict between Jews and Gentiles in Romans to be a coded reference to the differences between Psychics (people who are partly spiritual but have not yet achieved separation from carnality) and Pneumatics (totally spiritual people).

The Valentians argued that such codes were intrinsic in gnosticism, secrecy being important to ensuring proper progression to true inner understanding. In 2 Corinthians, Paul states he had heard ineffable words which it is not lawful for a man to utter, a position that gnostic initiates supported with respect to the higher gnostic teachings. However, Paul does also suggest Gnosis puffeth up (often this passage is found with gnosis translated - knowledge puffeth up), which appears to diminish support for gnosticism, but Clement of Alexandria offered the explanation that this meant to entertain great and true sentiments and was a reference to the magnitude of the effect of receiving it.

Counter-arguments

Irenaeus argued that the use of scripture was flawed by Gnostic groups such as the Valentinians, and he demonstrated his argument by taking arbitrary passages from various writings of Homer to compose a new story about Hercules. The individual passages were authentic, but the connected story was not of Homer's composition, and in fact the passages featured a number of different characters instead of just Hercules. Irenaeus compared this abuse of Homer to what he considered abuse of the New and Old Testaments by the gnostics.[4]

Marcion and Gnosticism

Marcion is sometimes described as a Gnostic philosopher. In some essential respects, Marcion proposed ideas which would have aligned well with Gnostic thought. Like the Gnostics, he argued that Jesus was essentially a divine spirit appearing to men in the shape of a human form, and not someone in a true physical body.[5] For Gnostics, every human being is born with a small piece of God's soul lodged within his/her spirit (akin to the notion of a 'Divine Spark').[5] God is thus intimately connected to and part of his creation.[5] Salvation lies in turning away from the physical world (which Gnostics regard as an illusion) and embracing the god-like qualities within.[5] Marcion, by contrast, held that the heavenly Father (the father of Jesus Christ) was an utterly alien god; he had no part in making the world, nor any connection with it.[5]

The Gospel of John

The anti-heresy works of Irenaeus quote from the Gospel of John, so some scholars cast doubt on the Authorship of the Gospel of John, such as K.G. Bretschneider (1776–1848), Hegel, and F.C. Baur (born 1792 - died 1860). These writers consider the gospel to be a 2nd-century polemic by an author holding the position of the orthodoxy. This is called into question by Rylands Library Papyrus P52, which contains a fragment from John chapter 18 dated with a fair measure of confidence to the first half of the 2nd century, as well as the recent work of Charles Hill, who gives evidence that the Gospel of John was used between AD 90 and 130, and the possible use of uniquely Johannine gospel material in several works which date from this period.[6]

The Pauline Epistles

Paul was a Jew of the tribe of Benjamin, born in Tarsus, and a member of the conservative Pharisee sect prior to conversion. He was brought up in Jerusalem at the feet of Gamaliel, one of the most highly regarded Hebrew teachers. Paul referred to himself as an Hebrew of the Hebrews.[7]

Resurrection

The resurrection of the dead by Michelangelo Buonarroti

In 1 Corinthians 15, Paul refers to baptism for the dead (15:29), a concept that was easily explained by gnostics, according to Elaine Pagels. The gnostics argued that the text was allegory, and their stance was that baptism for the dead refers to pneumatics (i.e., gnostics) taking the place of psychics (i.e., literalists), who were dead to gnosis. Tertullian wrote about Marcion gnostics in his work against Marcionism (Adversus Marcionem libri V), indicating that they believed in baptism of the dead. The doctrines of Marcion were so similar to the Gnostics that Irenaeus regarded him as one of them.

John Gill remarks in his commentary of 1 Corinthians 15:29, "some think the apostle [Paul] has in view a custom of some, who when their friends died without baptism, used to be baptized in their room; this is said to be practiced by the Marcionites in Tertullian's time, and by the Corinthians in the times of the Apostle John; but it does not appear to have been in use in the times of the Apostle Paul; and besides, if it had been, as it was a vain and superstitious one, he would never have mentioned it without a censure".[8]

Jameison-Faussett-Brown Commentary of 1 Corinthians 15:29 mentions, "Paul, without giving the least sanction to the practice, uses an ad hominem argument from it against its practitioners, some of whom, though using it, denied the resurrection: 'What account can they give of their practice; why are they at the trouble of it, if the dead rise not?' [So Jesus used an ad hominem argument, Matthew 12:27]." (Author's brackets)[9]

Ethics

In 1 Corinthians, Paul recommends celibacy, but also recommends marriage for those who are not suited for celibacy. Later (1 Cor. 9:5), he defends the right of Peter and the other apostles to be married and to travel accompanied by their wives, although most scholars determine Paul himself to be unmarried. In contrast, he condemned sexual immorality of all kinds, in various epistles (Romans 13:13, 1 Cor. 6:18, 1 Thess. 4:3), along with several other categories of sins, and making no exceptions for these.

See also

References

  1. ↑ Refutation of All Heresies Book IV http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/050105.htm
  2. ↑ Birger Albert Pearson Gnosticism and Christianity in Roman and Coptic Egypt 2004 p210
  3. ↑ Stephen Charles Haar Simon Magus: the first gnostic? p231
  4. ↑ Irenaeus Against Heresies Book 1 Chapter 9 Paragraph 4
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Adolf Von Harnack (2007) Marcion: The Gospel of the Alien God, translated by John E. Steely, Lyle D. Bierma, Wipf & Stock Publishers ISBN 9781556357039
  6. ↑ Hill, Charles E., The Johannine Corpus in the Early Church Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780199291441
  7. ↑

    Philippians 3:5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, [of] the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;
    Acts 22:2 (And when they heard that he spake in the Hebrew tongue to them, they kept the more silence: and he saith,)
    Acts 22:3 I am verily a man [which am] a Jew, born in Tarsus, [a city] in Cilicia, yet brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, [and] taught according to the perfect manner of the law of the fathers, and was zealous toward God, as ye all are this day.
    Acts 26:5 Which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify, that after the most straitest sect of our religion I lived a Pharisee.

  8. ↑ Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible 1Cor.15:29
  9. ↑ Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary (1871) 1Cor.15:29

Further reading

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 7/7/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.