Northwestern blot

The Northwestern blot, also known as the Northwestern assay, is a hybrid analytical technique of the Western blot and the Northern blot, and is used in molecular biology to detect interactions between RNA and proteins. A related technique, the Western blot, is used to detect a protein of interest that involves transferring proteins that are separated by gel electrophoresis onto a nitrocellulose membrane. A colored precipitate clusters along the band on the membrane containing a particular target protein. A Northern blot is a similar analytical technique that, instead of detecting a protein of interest, is used to study gene expression by detection of RNA (or isolated mRNA) on a similar membrane. The Northwestern blot combines the two techniques, and specifically involves the identification of labeled RNA that interact with proteins that are immobilized on a similar nitrocellulose membrane.

History

Sir Edwin Southern - 2012

Edwin Southern first created the Southern blot,[1] an analytical technique used to detect DNA. The technique involves using gel electrophoresis, an important analytical method that involves the use of an electric field and the subsequent migration of charged DNA, RNA or proteins through that electric field based on size and charge.[2] With a Southern Blot, the separated DNA fragments are then transferred to a filter membrane for detection.[1] Detection occurs as bands become visible on the membrane and correlate with a particular molecule of interest.[2] Subsequently, other similar blotting techniques were created with similar nomenclature to detect different molecules or interactions between molecules. These techniques include the Western blot (protein detection), the Northern blot (RNA detection), the Southwestern blot (DNA-protein interaction detection), the Eastern blot (post translational modification detection) and the Northwestern blot (RNA-protein interaction detection).[3][4][5][6]

Technique specifics

Running a Northwestern blot involves separating the RNA binding proteins by gel electrophoresis, which will separate the RNA binding proteins based upon their size and charge. Individual samples can be loaded in to the agarose or polyacrylamide gel (usually an SDS-PAGE) in order to analyze multiple samples at the same time.[5] Once the gel electrophoresis is complete, the gel and associated RNA binding proteins are transferred to a nitrocellulose transfer paper.[7]

The newly transferred blots are then soaked in a blocking solution; non-fat milk and bovine serum albumin are common blocking buffers.[8] This blocking solution assists with preventing non-specific binding of the primary and/or secondary antibodies to the nitrocellulose membrane. Once the blocking solution has adequate contact time with the blot, a specific competitor RNA is applied and given time to incubate at room temperature. During this time, the competitor RNA binds to the RNA binding proteins in the samples that are on the blot. The incubation time during this process can vary depending on the concentration of the competitor RNA applied; though incubation time is typically one hour.[9] After the incubation is complete, the blot is usually washed at least 3 times for 5 minutes each wash, in order to dilute out the RNA in the solution. Common wash buffers include Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) or a 10% Tween 20 solution.[10] Improper or inadequate washing will affect the clarity of the development of the blot. Once washing is complete the blot is then typically developed by x-ray or similar autoradiography methods.[11]

Applications

After developing the blot using xray or autoradiography, the results can be analyzed and interpreted to determine the approximate size and concentration of the RNA binding protein(s) of interest to further study the protein(s). The location and concentration of the RNA binding protein on the blot can affect the results, and bands can sometimes appear after development. These bands can help researchers determine the size and concentration of the RNA binding protein of interest.[12] When the approximate size of the protein is known, the original sample can be run on a chromatography machine to separate it by size.[13] In addition, once the protein is isolated, it can be digested with trypsin, and Mass Spectrometry can be utilized to sequence the peptides in order to determine the identity of the specific protein.[14]

Advantages and disadvantages

Advantages of Northwestern blotting include the expedited detection of specific proteins that bind RNA, as well as the assessment of the approximate molecular weights of those proteins.[15] The Northwestern blot allows for detection of identified proteins in a way that is inexpensive. The blot is typically a first step in research, as it allows for the identification of the approximate molecular weights, once the molecular weight is known it allows for further research or purification through other methods like chromatography. Another advantage of the Northwestern blot is that it aides in the building of expression libraries of cognate ligands.[16]

A noted disadvantage is that some RNA-Protein interactions with poor RNA binding properties may not be as detectable with this technique.[15] Also the procedure for blotting can take from 3 to 5 hours. If the procedure is not done correctly it can result in significant background which can result in an unclear blot of the proteins identified. In addition, proteins need to renature after being separated and transferred to the nitrocellulose membrane. One last disadvantage is that proteins must consist of a single polypeptide or two subunits that comigrate in the gel matrix.[17]

See also

Protocols

Northwestern Blot of Protein-RNA Interaction from Young Rice Panicles

RNA Isolation and Northern Blot Analysis

Protein Blotting

References

  1. 1 2 Southern, Edwin Mellor (5 November 1975). "Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis". Journal of Molecular Biology. 98 (3): 503–517. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(75)80083-0. ISSN 0022-2836. PMID 1195397.
  2. 1 2 Nelson, Cox (2013). Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company. p. 179. ISBN 978-1-4641-0962-1.
  3. Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J. Raff, M., Roberts, K., Walter, P. 2008. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 5th ed. Garland Science, Taylor & Francis Group, NY, pp 538-539.
  4. Kevil, C. G., Walsh, L., Laroux, F. S., Kalogeris, T., Grisham, M. B., Alexander, J. S. (1997) An Improved, Rapid Northern Protocol. Biochem. and Biophys. Research Comm. 238:277-279.
  5. 1 2 Rapley, R (2000). The Nucleic Acid Protocols Handbook. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc. p. 783. ISBN 0-89603-459-3.
  6. Nicholas; Nelson (2013). "North, South, or East? Blotting Techniques". Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 133 (e10): e10. doi:10.1038/jid.2013.216.
  7. Verena, Bichsel; Alfred Walz; Matthias Bickel (1997). "Identification of proteins binding specifically to the 3'-untranslated region of granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factro mRNA" (PDF). Nucleic Acids Research. 25 (12): 2417–2423. doi:10.1093/nar/25.12.2417. PMID 9171094. Retrieved 7 May 2014.
  8. Liao, Huey-Jane; Ryuji Kobyashi and Michael B. Matthews; Mathews, M. B. (July 21, 1998). "Activities of adenovirus virus-associated RNAs: Purification and characterization of RNA binding proteins". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 95 (15): 8514. Bibcode:1998PNAS...95.8514L. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.15.8514. PMID 9671709. Retrieved 23 April 2014.
  9. C, Franke; Grafe D; Bartsch H; Bachmann M (2009). "Use of non-radioactive detection method for north- and southwestern blot". Methods of Molecular Biology. Methods in Molecular Biology. 536: 441–9. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-542-8_44. ISBN 978-1-934115-73-2. PMID 19378081.
  10. Schumacher, Jill; Keesook Lee; Susanne Edelhoff; Robert Braun (May 1995). "Spnr, a Murine RNA-binding Protein That Is Localized to Cytoplasmic Microtubules" (PDF). The Journal of Cell Biology. 129 (4): 1023–1032. doi:10.1083/jcb.129.4.1023. PMC 2120489Freely accessible. PMID 7744952. Retrieved 7 May 2014.
  11. Stohlman, S A; R S Baric; G N Nelson; L H Soe; L M Welter; R J Deans (1988). "Specific interaction between coronavirus leader RNA and nucleocapsid protein" (PDF). Journal of Virology. 11. 62 (11): 4288. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
  12. Thangasamy, Saminathan. "Northwestern Blot of Protein-RNA Interaction from Young Rice Panicles". Retrieved 26 March 2014.
  13. Perdew, Gary (Aug 17, 2008). Regulation of Gene Expression: Molecular Mechanisms. Springer. p. 129. ISBN 9781597452281.
  14. Gary H. Perdew; Jack P. Vanden Heuvel; Jeffrey M. Peters (2008). Regulation of Gene Expression: Molecular Mechanisms. Springer. p. 129. ISBN 9781597452281.
  15. 1 2 Smith, Christopher W.J. (1998). RNA-Protein Interactions : A Practical Approach: A Practical Approach. Oxford University Press. p. 187. ISBN 9780191591624.
  16. Waldo, Cohen (Aug 16, 1991). Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology. Academic Press. p. 186. ISBN 9780080863290.
  17. Nicholson, Allen W. (2001). Ribonucleases, Part A: Functional Roles and Mechanisms of Action: Functional Roles and Mechanisms of Action. Academic Press. p. 409. ISBN 9780080496917.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 9/24/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.