Military establishment of the Roman kingdom
Part of a series on the | ||||
Military of ancient Rome | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Structural history | ||||
|
||||
Campaign history | ||||
Technological history | ||||
|
||||
Political history | ||||
|
||||
Strategy and tactics | ||||
|
||||
Military of ancient Rome portal | ||||
The city of Rome, founded in a strategic location among a war-like people (the Etruscans), needed to concern itself with military activity from the start. As Rome grew, its military needs changed. This article covers the Military establishment of the Roman kingdom up to about 300BC.
Initial army
Rome was probably founded as a compromise between Etruscan residents of the area and Italic tribes nearby. The kings were Etruscan. Their language was still spoken by noble families in the early empire, although sources tell us it was dying out. Under the first king, Romulus, society consisted of gentes, or clans, arranged in 80 curiae and three tribes. From them were selected 8000 pedites (infantry) and 800 celeres (cavalry) of gentes-connected men. The decimal scheme seems already to have existed: one unit of fast troops for every 10 of foot.
The Etruscans were heavily influenced by Greek culture, which can be viewed as dominating the eastern Mediterranean. At first, under the Etruscan Kings, the massive Greek phalanx was the most desired battle formation. Early Roman soldiers hence must have looked much like Greek hoplites. However for the military in ancient Rome it was dictated what armor and weapons you had to your disposal based on classes in ancient Rome.[1]
Reforms of Servius Tullius
A key moment in Roman history was the introduction of the census (the counting of the people) under Servius Tullius. He had found that the aristocratic organization now did not provide enough men for defense against the hill tribes, and, consequently, he accepted non-aristocrats into the state and reorganized society on the basis of wealth, determined at the census.
Citizens were graded into six classes by property assessment. From them were recruited milities according to the equipment they could afford and the needs of the state.
From the wealthiest classes were recruited the heavy-armed infantry, equipped like the Greek hoplite warrior with helmet, round shield (clipeus), greaves and breastplate, all of bronze, and carrying a spear (hasta) and sword (not the gladius). In battle they followed the principle of "two forward, one back." The first and second acies, or lines of battle, composed of principes and hastati, were forward; the triarii or "third rank", containing the veterani, or "old ones", was held in reserve. From the name, hastati, we can deduce that the hasta, a thrusting spear, was the weapon of choice. Triarii were equipped with a long spear, or pike, a shield and heavy armor.
The remaining class or classes (rorarii) were light-armed with the javelin (verutum). They were no doubt used for skirmishing, which provided some disruption of enemy ranks before the main event.
The officers as well as the cavalry were either not in the six classes or were of the first class. The question remains open. If the nobility were above the six, they were drawn from the senatorial rank or rank of equestrians (equites), also known as knights. Cavalry remained an aristocratic arm up to the introduction of motorized warfare.
Reforms of Camillus
All in all the Roman army consisted of 18 centuries of equites, 82 centuries of the first class (of which 2 centuries were engineers), 20 centuries each of the second, third and fourth classes and 32 centuries of the fifth class (of which 2 centuries were trumpeters).
Even these measures were inadequate to the challenges Rome was to face. They went to war with the Hernici, Volsci and Latini (Italics), undertook the reduction of Etruria and endured an invasion of Gauls under Brennus. Into the gap stepped one of the great generals Rome seemed able to produce at critical moments: Marcus Furius Camillus. He held various offices, such as interrex and dictator, but was never king himself.
In the early fourth century BC Rome received its greatest humiliation, as Po valley Celts under Brennus sacked Rome itself. The Romans wanted to abandon the city and resettle at Veii (an Etruscan city), but Camillus prevented it. If Rome was to re-establish her authority over central Italy, and be prepared to meet any similar disasters in future, some reorganization was needed. These changes were traditionally believed to have been the work of Camillus, but in another theory they were introduced gradually during the second half of the fourth century BC.
Italy was not governed by city states like Greece, where armies met on large plains, deemed suitable by both sides, to reach a decision. Far more it was a collection of hill tribes using the difficult terrain to their advantage. Something altogether more flexible was needed to combat such foes than the unwieldy, slow-moving phalanx.
The legio, or "levy", was introduced at this time, with a structure of manipuli ("handsful"). The infantry adopted a looser fighting formation distinct from the earlier tightly packed hoplite shield wall, and soldiers began to carry javelins. In this formation the Romans became more like their Gallic adversaries than Greek hoplites.
Conscripting of Ancient Roman Soldiers
In Ancient Rome when it was time to draft additional soldiers into the military they would look towards their citizens for assistance in the defense of Rome. In The writings of Polybius it was in the natural order of a Roman citizen to fight in the military. However, when in the military it was divided by class by wealth. For the unwealthy they were called Velties and made up most of the heavy infantry of the legion. The Equites were in the higher class of citizenship because they could afford a horse and was drafted into the Cavalry.
Ranks of the Soldiers
While Roman citizens could fight for the empire of Rome, non-citizens could fight as well; however, they would be paid less and were not given the best armor and weaponry, as were the actual citizens of Rome. These soldiers were called auxiliaries.The Roman Army was divided into 30 legions which in total were divided into subranks and ranks below that. Each legion was made up of about 4000 to 5000 men. Each man was a legionnaire. Each legion was made up of 10 Cohorts, a Cohort was a group of 480 legionnaires. That then was divided into six groups of eighty men and these were called a century which was led by a centurion. Within each century they were further divided into eight groups called contubernia.
While in this stretch the Centurion, was stead to lead 100 legionnaires. Centurions have been thought to lead from the writings of Polybius the Centuries, and have been keen in the roman military stance of tactics, leadership and knowledge of their troops.The centurion was a key part of the roman military because he gave the his leadership to the troops that were divided among cohorts and legions ,however it gave them the morale for each to be a decisive point in their ranks because of the centurion.[2]
Framework for Combat
That their are multiple degrees of influence on this subject it is based off the individual solider to the legion then also compared to the ways of combat being in melee or by ranged combat each being in a different respect.
For individual experience it is framed as for legionnaires that you will be very aggressive and fight for a time of 15 to 20 minutes and trying to stay alive while doing this and going to rest and let the for the formations re-rank and let them rest; which is an achievement that is very worthy to fight hand to hand in combat with more than likely overwhelming odds and trying to stay alive while still fighting an keeping a line in the battlefield is quite a feat. For ranged combat is would be common in the legion ,however it isn't truly elaborated on.[3]
See also
References
- ↑ "The Early Legion (4th century BC)". The Roman Empire.
- 1 2 Rubio-Campillo, Xavier; Matías, Pau Valdés; Ble, Eduard (8 August 2015). "Centurions in the Roman Legion: Computer Simulation and Complex Systems". Journal of Interdisciplinary History. 46 (2): 245–263. doi:10.1162/JINH_a_00833 – via Project MUSE.
- 1 2 J. (2013). James. Retrieved October 11, 2016, from http://primaryfacts.com/1179/roman-army-facts/
- ↑ Military establishment of the Roman Republic
- ↑ Santosuosso, Antonio (16 January 2007). "Greek and Roman Warfare: Battles, Tactics, and Trickery (review)". The Journal of Military History. 71 (1): 208–209. doi:10.1353/jmh.2007.0074 – via Project MUSE.