Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders
Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Argued December 7, 2010 Decided June 13, 2011 | |||||||
Full case name | Janus Capital Group, Inc., et al. v. First Derivative Traders | ||||||
Docket nos. | 09-525 | ||||||
Citations | |||||||
Argument | Oral argument | ||||||
Prior history | Dismissed sub nom. In re Mutual Funds Inv. Litigation, 487 F.Supp.2d 618 (D. Md. 2007); reversed, 566 F.3d 111 (3d Cir. 2009); certiorari granted, 561 U.S. 1024 (2010) | ||||||
Holding | |||||||
A service provider cannot be held liable in a private action under SEC Rule 10b-5. | |||||||
Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
Case opinions | |||||||
Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Alito | ||||||
Dissent | Breyer, joined by Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan |
Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders, 564 U.S. 135 (2011), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that a service provider cannot be held liable in a private action under SEC Rule 10b-5.[1]
References
- ↑ Janus Capital Group v. First Derivative Traders United States Supreme Court, Syllabus p. 1, "Held: Because the false statements included in the prospectuses were made by Janus Investment Fund, not by JCM, JCM and JCG cannot be held liable in a private action under Rule 10b–5."
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/4/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.