Islington South (UK Parliament constituency)
Islington South | |
---|---|
Former Borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
1885–1950 | |
Number of members | one |
Replaced by | Islington South West |
Created from | Finsbury |
Islington South was a parliamentary constituency in the Metropolitan Borough of Islington in North London. It returned one Member of Parliament to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
The constituency was created for the 1885 general election, and abolished for the 1950 general election.
Boundaries
1885-1918
The constituency was defined as comprising three wards of the parish of Islington: Barnsbury, St Mary and St Peter. These wards were used for the election of vestryman under the Metropolis Management Act 1855.[1]
1918-1950
Under the Representation of the People Act 1918 constituencies in the County of London were redefined in terms of the Metropolitan Boroughs created in 1900. The constituency was defined as comprising three wards of the Metropolitan Borough of Islington having the same names as the previous wards: Barnsbury, St Mary and St Peter.[1]
Members of Parliament
Election | Member | Party | |
---|---|---|---|
1885 | Henry Spicer | Liberal | |
1886 | Sir Albert Rollit | Conservative | |
1906 | Thomas Wiles | Liberal | |
1918 | Sir Charles Frederick Higham | Unionist | |
1922 | Charles Samuel Garland | Unionist | |
1923 | William Sampson Cluse | Labour | |
1931 | Tom Forrest Howard | Conservative | |
1935 | William Sampson Cluse | Labour | |
1950 | constituency abolished |
Elections
Elections in the 1880s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Henry Spicer | 3,050 | 54.9 | n/a | |
Conservative | H. Wildey Wright | 2,502 | 45.1 | n/a | |
Majority | 548 | 9.8 | n/a | ||
Turnout | 7,024 | 79.0 | n/a | ||
Liberal win (new seat) | |||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir Albert Kaye Rollit | 2,774 | 55.7 | 10.6 | |
Liberal | Henry Spicer | 2,208 | 44.3 | -10.6 | |
Majority | 566 | 11.4 | |||
Turnout | 7,024 | 70.9 | |||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | ||||
Elections in the 1890s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir Albert Kaye Rollit | 3,194 | 52.6 | -3.1 | |
Liberal | William Digby | 2,873 | 47.4 | 3.1 | |
Majority | 321 | 5.2 | |||
Turnout | 8,299 | 73.1 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir Albert Kaye Rollit | 3,563 | 60.3 | 7.7 | |
Liberal | Heber Leonidas Hart | 2,342 | 39.7 | -7.7 | |
Majority | 1,221 | 20.6 | |||
Turnout | 8,244 | 71.6 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | ||||
Elections in the 1900s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Sir Albert Kaye Rollit | 3,881 | 70.0 | 9.7 | |
Liberal | James Andrew Strahan | 1,665 | 30.0 | -9.7 | |
Majority | 2,216 | 40.0 | |||
Turnout | 8,796 | 63.1 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Thomas Wiles | 3,606 | 55.8 | 25.8 | |
Conservative | Sir Albert Kaye Rollit | 1,991 | 30.8 | -39.2 | |
Independent Conservative | W. Hunt | 870 | 13.5 | ||
Majority | 1,615 | 24.9 | |||
Turnout | 8,361 | 77.3 | |||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | ||||
Elections in the 1910s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Thomas Wiles | 3,917 | 55.1 | -0.7 | |
Conservative | David Faber | 3,187 | 44.9 | 14.1 | |
Majority | 730 | 10.2 | |||
Turnout | 8,268 | 85.9 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Thomas Wiles | 3,494 | 55.5 | 0.4 | |
Conservative | Lionel Wormser Harris | 2,803 | 44.5 | -0.4 | |
Majority | 691 | 11.0 | |||
Turnout | 8,268 | 76.2 | |||
Liberal hold | Swing | ||||
General Election 1914/15:
Another General Election was required to take place before the end of 1915. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place and by the July 1914, the following candidates had been selected;
- Liberal: Thomas Wiles
- Unionist:
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | 6,885 | 53.9 | |||
Liberal | Rt Hon. Thomas Wiles | 5,883 | 46.1 | ||
Majority | 1,002 | 7.8 | |||
Turnout | 44.1 | ||||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | ||||
- endorsed by Coalition Government
Elections in the 1920s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Charles Samuel Garland | 7,877 | 36.1 | -17.8 | |
Liberal | Rt Hon. Thomas Wiles | 7,352 | 33.6 | -12.5 | |
Labour | Frederick William Pethick-Lawrence | 6,634 | 30.3 | n/a | |
Majority | 525 | 2.5 | -5.4 | ||
Turnout | 64.2 | +20.1 | |||
Unionist hold | Swing | -2.7 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | William Sampson Cluse | 7,764 | 37.0 | +6.7 | |
Liberal | Edward Brotherton-Ratcliffe | 7,531 | 35.9 | +2.3 | |
Unionist | Charles Samuel Garland | 5,691 | 27.1 | -9.0 | |
Majority | 233 | 1.1 | 3.6 | ||
Turnout | 60.9 | -3.3 | |||
Labour gain from Unionist | Swing | +2.2 | |||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | William Sampson Cluse | 10,347 | 42.8 | ||
Unionist | Tom Forrest Howard | 8,668 | 35.9 | ||
Liberal | Edward Brotherton-Ratcliffe | 5,158 | 21.3 | ||
Majority | 1,679 | 6.9 | |||
Turnout | 69.4 | ||||
Labour hold | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | William Sampson Cluse | 13,737 | 46.6 | +3.8 | |
Unionist | Tom Forrest Howard | 9,418 | 32.0 | -3.9 | |
Liberal | Frank Milton | 6,316 | 21.4 | +0.1 | |
Majority | 4,319 | 14.6 | +7.7 | ||
Turnout | 66.2 | -3.2 | |||
Labour hold | Swing | +3.8 | |||
Elections in the 1930s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Tom Forrest Howard | 18,071 | 62.4 | ||
Labour | William Sampson Cluse | 10,910 | 37.6 | ||
Majority | 7,161 | 24.7 | |||
Turnout | 28,981 | 64.8 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | ||||
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | William Sampson Cluse | 12,526 | 52.4 | +17.2 | |
Conservative | Tom Forrest Howard | 11,398 | 47.6 | -17.2 | |
Majority | 1,128 | 4.7 | -29.4 | ||
Turnout | 23,924 | 56.7 | -8.1 | ||
Labour gain from Conservative | Swing | ||||
General Election 1939/40
Another General Election was required to take place before the end of 1940. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place and by the Autumn of 1939, the following candidates had been selected;
- Labour: William Sampson Cluse[4]
- Conservative: Tom Forrest Howard
Elections in the 1940s
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Labour | William Sampson Cluse | 12,893 | 72.5 | +20.1 | |
Conservative | Tom Forrest Howard | 4,877 | 27.5 | -20.1 | |
Majority | 8,016 | 45.1 | |||
Turnout | 64.0 | ||||
Labour hold | Swing | ||||
See also
References
- 1 2 Youngs, Frederic A, Jr. (1979). Guide to the Local Administrative Units of England, Vol.I: Southern England. London: Royal Historical Society. pp. 743, 749. ISBN 0901050679.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 British Parliamentary Election Results 1885-1918, FWS Craig
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 British Parliamentary Election Results 1918-1949, FWS Craig
- ↑ Report of the Annual Conference of the Labour Party, 1939
- Leigh Rayment's Historical List of MPs – Constituencies beginning with "I"
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1885-1918, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (Macmillan Press 1974)
- Debrett’s Illustrated Heraldic and Biographical House of Commons and the Judicial Bench 1886
- Debrett’s House of Commons and the Judicial Bench 1901
- Debrett’s House of Commons and the Judicial Bench 1918