David Brooks (journalist)

This article is about an American journalist. For other people named David Brooks, see David Brooks (disambiguation).
David Brooks
Born (1961-08-11) August 11, 1961
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Residence Washington, D.C., United States
Nationality American
Alma mater University of Chicago (A.B. 1983)
Occupation Columnist, pundit
Spouse(s) Sarah (née Jane Hughes; 1986–2014; divorced; 3 children)

David Brooks (born August 11, 1961)[1] is an American conservative[2][3] political and cultural commentator who writes for The New York Times.[4] He has worked as a film critic for The Washington Times, a reporter and later op-ed editor for The Wall Street Journal;[5] a senior editor at The Weekly Standard from its inception; a contributing editor at Newsweek and The Atlantic Monthly; and a commentator on NPR. He is currently a columnist for The New York Times and commentator on PBS NewsHour.[1]

Early life and education

Brooks was born in Toronto, Ontario—his father was working on his PhD in Canada at the time—and spent his early years in the middle-income Stuyvesant Town housing development in lower Manhattan. His father taught English literature at New York University, while his mother studied nineteenth-century British history at Columbia. Although his family was Jewish, Brooks himself is not religiously observant.[6][7][8][9] As a young child, Brooks attended the Grace Church School, an independent Episcopal primary school in Greenwich Village. When he was 12, his family moved to the Philadelphia Main Line, the affluent suburbs of Philadelphia. He graduated from Radnor High School in 1979. In 1983, Brooks graduated from the University of Chicago with a degree in history.[1] His senior thesis was on popular science writer Robert Ardrey.[9]

As an undergraduate, Brooks frequently contributed reviews and satirical pieces to campus publications. His senior year, he wrote a spoof of the lifestyle of wealthy conservative William F. Buckley Jr., who was scheduled to speak at the university: "In the afternoons he is in the habit of going into crowded rooms and making everybody else feel inferior. The evenings are reserved for extended bouts of name-dropping."[10] To his piece, Brooks appended the note: “Some would say I’m envious of Mr. Buckley. But if truth be known, I just want a job and have a peculiar way of asking. So how about it, Billy? Can you spare a dime?” When Buckley arrived to give his talk, he asked whether Brooks was in the lecture audience and offered him a job.[11]

Early career

Upon graduation, Brooks became a police reporter for the City News Bureau of Chicago, a wire service owned jointly by the Chicago Tribune and Chicago Sun Times.[1] He says that his experience on Chicago's crime beat had a conservatizing influence on him[9] In 1984, mindful of the offer he had previously received from William F. Buckley, Brooks applied and was accepted as an intern on Buckley's National Review. According to Christopher Beam, the internship included an all-access pass to the affluent life style that Brooks had previously mocked, including yachting expeditions; Bach concerts; dinners at Buckley’s Park Avenue apartment and villa in Stamford, Connecticut; and a constant stream of writers, politicians, and celebrities.

Brooks was an outsider in more ways than his relative inexperience. National Review was a Catholic magazine, and Brooks is not Catholic. Sam Tanenhaus later reported in The New Republic that Buckley might have eventually named Brooks his successor if it hadn’t been for his being Jewish. “If true, it would be upsetting,” Brooks says.[9]

After his internship with Buckley ended, Brooks spent some time at the conservative Hoover Institution at Stanford University and then got a job writing movie reviews for The Washington Times.

Career

In 1986, Brooks was hired by the Wall Street Journal, where he worked first as an editor of the book review section, enlisting William Kristol to review Allan Bloom's famous The Closing of the American Mind, which helped to put the book to national prominence. He also filled in for five months as a movie critic. From 1990–94, The Wall Street Journal posted Brooks as an op-ed columnist to Brussels, whence he covered Russia (making numerous trips to Moscow); the Middle East; South Africa; and European affairs. On his return, Brooks joined the neo-conservative Weekly Standard when it was launched in 1994–95. In 1996, he edited an anthology, Backward and Upward: The New Conservative Writing.[1][5]

In 2000, Brooks published a book of cultural commentary titled Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There to considerable acclaim. The book, a paean to consumerism, argued that the new managerial or "new upper class" represents a marriage between the liberal idealism of the 1960s and the self-interest of the 1980s.

According to a 2010 article in New York Magazine written by Christopher Beam, New York Times editorial-page editor Gail Collins called Brooks in 2003 and invited him to lunch.

Collins was looking for a conservative to replace outgoing columnist William Safire, but one who understood how liberals think. “I was looking for the kind of conservative writer that wouldn’t make our readers shriek and throw the paper out the window,” says Collins. “He was perfect.” Brooks started writing in September 2003. “The first six months were miserable,” Brooks says. “I’d never been hated on a mass scale before.”[9]

In 2004, Brooks' book On Paradise Drive: How We Live Now (And Always Have) in the Future Tense was published as a sequel to his 2000 best seller, Bobos in Paradise, but it was not as well received as its predecessor. Brooks is also the volume editor of The Best American Essays (publication date October 2, 2012), and he authored The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character and Achievement.[12] The book was excerpted in The New Yorker magazine in January 2011[13] and received mixed reviews upon its full publication, by Random House, in March of that year.[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The book has been a commercial success, reaching the #3 spot on the Publishers Weekly best-sellers list for non-fiction in April 2011.[21]

Brooks was a visiting professor of public policy at Duke University's Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy, and taught an undergraduate seminar there in the fall of 2006.[22] In 2013, he taught a course at Yale University on philosophical humility.[23]

In 2012, Brooks was elected to the University of Chicago Board of Trustees.[24] He also serves on the Board of Advisors for the University of Chicago Institute of Politics.[25]

Political views

Brooks and PBS staff at rehearsal for PBS Newshour in 2012.

Ottawa Citizen conservative commentator David Warren has identified Brooks as a "sophisticated pundit" ; one of "those Republicans who want to 'engage with' the liberal agenda."[26] When asked what he thinks of charges that he's "not a real conservative" or "squishy," Brooks has said that "if you define conservative by support for the Republican candidate or the belief that tax cuts are the correct answer to all problems, I guess I don’t fit that agenda. But I do think that I’m part of a long-standing conservative tradition that has to do with Edmund Burke... and Alexander Hamilton."[27] In fact, Brooks read Edmund Burke's work while he was an undergraduate at the University of Chicago and "completely despised it," but "gradually over the next five to seven years... came to agree with him." Brooks claims that "my visceral hatred was because he touched something I didn't like or know about myself."[28] In September 2012, Brooks talked about being criticized from the conservative side, saying, "If it’s from a loon, I don’t mind it. I get a kick out of it. If it’s Michelle Malkin attacking, I don’t mind it." With respect to whether he was "the liberals' favorite conservative" Brooks said he "didn't care," stating: "I don’t mind liberals praising me, but when it’s the really partisan liberals, you get an avalanche of love, it’s like uhhh, I gotta rethink this."[27]

Brooks describes himself as having originally been a liberal before, as he put it, "coming to my senses." He recounts that a turning point in his thinking came while he was still an undergraduate, when he was selected to present the socialist point of view during a televised debate with Nobel laureate free-market economist Milton Friedman.[6] As Brooks describes it, "[It] was essentially me making a point, and he making a two-sentence rebuttal which totally devastated my point. That didn’t immediately turn me into a conservative, but....”[29]

Before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Brooks argued forcefully for American military intervention, echoing the belief of commentators and political figures that American and British forces would be welcomed as liberators.[30][31] In 2005, Brooks wrote what columnist Jonathan Chait described as "a witheringly condescending column" portraying Senator Harry Reid "as an unhinged conspiracy theorist because he accused the [George W. Bush] administration of falsifying its Iraq intelligence."[32][33] By 2008, five years into the war, Brooks maintained that the decision to go to war was correct, but that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld had botched U.S. war efforts.[34] In 2015, Brooks wrote that "[f]rom the current vantage point, the decision to go to war was a clear misjudgment" made in 2003 by President Bush and the majority of Americans who supported the war, including Brooks himself.[35] Brooks wrote "many of us thought that, by taking down Saddam Hussein, we could end another evil empire, and gradually open up human development in Iraq and the Arab world. Has that happened? In 2004, I would have said yes. In 2006, I would have said no. In 2015, I say yes and no, but mostly no."[35] Citing the Robb-Silberman report, Brooks rejected as a "fable" the idea that "intelligence about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction was all cooked by political pressure, that there was a big political conspiracy to lie us into war."[35] Instead, Brooks viewed the war as a product of faulty intelligence, writing that "[t]he Iraq war error reminds us of the need for epistemological modesty."[35]

His dismissal of the conviction of Scooter Libby as being "a farce" and having "no significance"[36] was derided by political blogger Andrew Sullivan.[37]

On August 10, 2006, Brooks wrote a column for The New York Times entitled "Party No. 3". The column proposed the idea of the McCain-Lieberman Party, or the fictional representation of the fictional moderate majority in America.[38]

Brooks has long been a supporter of John McCain; however, he disliked McCain's 2008 running mate, Sarah Palin, calling her a "cancer" on the Republican Party.[39] He has referred to her as a "joke," unlikely ever to win the Republican nomination.[40] But he later admitted during a C-SPAN interview that he had gone too far in his previous "cancer" comments about Palin, which he regretted, and simply stated he was not a fan of her values.[41]

In a March 2007, article published in The New York Times titled "No U-Turns",[42] Brooks explained that the Republican Party must distance itself from the minimal-government conservative principles that had arisen during the Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan eras. He claims that these core concepts had served their purposes and should no longer be embraced by Republicans in order to win elections. Alex Pareene commented that Brooks "has been trying for so long to imagine a sensible Republican Party into existence that he can’t still think it’s going to happen soon."[43]

Brooks has frequently expressed admiration for President Barack Obama. In an August 2009, profile of Brooks, The New Republic describes his first encounter with Obama, in the spring of 2005: "Usually when I talk to senators, while they may know a policy area better than me, they generally don’t know political philosophy better than me. I got the sense he knew both better than me. [...] I remember distinctly an image of--we were sitting on his couches, and I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant, and I’m thinking, a) he’s going to be president and b) he’ll be a very good president.”[44] Brooks appreciates that Obama thinks "like a writer," explaining, "He's a very writerly personality, a little aloof, exasperated. He's calm. He's not addicted to people."[28] Two days after Obama’s second autobiography, The Audacity of Hope, hit bookstores, Brooks published a column in The New York Times, titled "Run, Barack, Run", urging the Chicago politician to run for president.[45] However, in December 2011, during a CSPAN interview, Brooks' expressed a more tempered opinion of Obama's presidency, giving Obama only a "B-" rating, and saying that Obama's chances of re-election would be less than 50-50 if elections were held at that time.[41] He stated, "I don't think he's integrated himself with people in Washington as much as he should have."[28] However, in a February 2016 New York Times Op-Ed, Brooks admitted that he missed Obama during the 2016 primary season, admiring the president's "integrity" and "humanity" among other characteristics.[46]

In writing for The New York Times in January 2010, Brooks described Israel as "an astonishing success story".[47] He wrote that "Jews are a famously accomplished group," who, because they were "forced to give up farming in the Middle Ages... have been living off their wits ever since".[47] In Brooks' view, "Israel’s technological success is the fruition of the Zionist dream. The country was not founded so stray settlers could sit among thousands of angry Palestinians in Hebron. It was founded so Jews would have a safe place to come together and create things for the world."[47][48]

In 2015, Brooks issued his commentary on poverty reform in the United States. His op-ed in The New York Times titled “The Nature of Poverty” specifically followed the social uproar caused by the Freddie Grey death, and concluded that federal spending is not the issue impeding the progress of poverty reforms, but rather that the impediments to upward mobility are “matters of social psychology”.[49] When discussing Freddie Grey in particular, Brooks claimed that Grey as a young man was “not on the path to upward mobility”.[49]

In regards to the 2016 election, Brooks has spoken in support of Hillary Clinton, applauding her ability to be “competent” and “normal” in comparison to her Republican counterpart, Donald Trump.[50][51] In addition, Brooks has noted that he believes Clinton will eventually become victorious in the election, as he foresees the general American public becoming “sick” of Donald Trump.[50][51]

When discussing the political emergence of Trump, Brooks has been strong is his critiques of the candidate, most notably by authoring a New York Times op-ed he titled “No, Not Trump, Not Ever”. In this piece, Brooks attacked Trump by arguing he is “is epically unprepared to be president” and by pointing out Trump’s “steady obliviousness to accuracy”.[52]

Social views

Brooks opposes what he sees as self-destructive behavior, such as the prevalence of teenage sex and divorce. His view is that "sex is more explicit everywhere barring real life. As the entertainment media have become more sex-saturated, American teenagers have become more sexually abstemious" by "waiting longer to have sex...[and] having fewer partners." He sees the culture war as nearly over, because "today's young people...seem happy with the frankness of the left and the wholesomeness of the right." As a result, he is optimistic about the United States' social stability, which he considers to be "in the middle of an amazing moment of improvement and repair."[53]

As early as 2003, Brooks wrote favorably of same-sex marriage, pointing out that marriage is a traditional conservative value. Rather than opposing it, he wrote: "We should insist on gay marriage. We should regard it as scandalous that two people could claim to love each other and not want to sanctify their love with marriage and fidelity.... It's going to be up to conservatives to make the important, moral case for marriage, including gay marriage."[54]

Brooks also takes a moderate position on abortion, which he thinks should be legal, but with parental consent for minors, during the first four or five months, and illegal afterward, except in extremely rare circumstances. (New York Times, April 22, 2002)[55]

On the legalization of drugs, he has expressed opposition to the liberalization of marijuana, advocating that it encourages morally reprovable behavior. Brooks relates that he smoked it in his youth but quit after a humiliating incident: Brooks smoked marijuana during lunch hour at school and felt embarrassed during a class presentation that afternoon in which he says he was incapable of intelligible speech.[56]

Criticisms

Brooks' writing on sociology has been criticised for being based on stereotypes and presenting false claims as factual.[57][58] In 2004, Sasha Issenberg, writing for Philadelphia magazine, fact-checked Bobos in Paradise, concluding that many of its comments about middle America were misleading or the exact reverse of the truth.[59] He reported Brooks as insisting that the book was not intended to be factual but to report his impressions of what he believed an area to be like: "He laughed...'[The book was] partially tongue-in-cheek'...I went through some of the other instances where he made declarations that appeared insupportable. He accused me of being 'too pedantic,' of “taking all of this too literally,' of 'taking a joke and distorting it.' 'That's totally unethical', he said." Brooks later said the article made him feel that "I suck...I can’t remember what I said but my mother told me I was extremely stupid.”[9] In 2015, Salon found that Brooks had got 'nearly every detail' wrong about a poll of high-school students.[60]

Michael Kinsley argued that Brooks was guilty of "fearless generalizing... Brooks does not let the sociology get in the way of the shtick, and he wields a mean shoehorn when he needs the theory to fit the joke."[61] Writing for Gawker, which has consistently criticised Brooks' work, opinion writer Tom Scocca argued that Brooks' career since 2004 had been marked by supporting political stands based on moral judgments and disdaining those citing evidence or statistical research, noting that "possibly that is because he perceives facts and statistics as an opportunity...to work mischief."[62] Furthermore, Annie Lowrey, in writing for the New York Magazine, criticized Brooks’ statistical methods when arguing his stance on political reform, claiming he used “some very tricksy, misleading math”.[63]

Additionally, Sean Illing of Slate criticized the same article from Brooks, claiming Brooks argued his point by framing his sources’ arguments out of context and routinely making bold “half-right” assumptions regarding the controversial issue of poverty reform.[64]

In 2016, James Taranto criticized[65] Brooks' analysis[66] of a U.S. Supreme Court case,[67] writing that "Brooks’s treatment of this case is either deliberately deceptive or recklessly ignorant."[65] Law professor Ann Althouse concurred that Brooks "distorts rather grotesquely" the case in question.[68] Brooks was previously criticized by Lyle Denniston with regard to another case, for having "scrambled the actual significance of what the Supreme Court has done".[69]

Legacy

Sidney Awards

This article is about the Sidney Awards given each December by David Brooks. For the award presented by the Hillman Foundation, see The Sidney Award.

In 2004 Brooks created an award to honor the best political and cultural journalism of the year. Named for philosopher Sidney Hook and originally called "The Hookies," the honor was renamed "The Sidney Awards" in 2005. The awards are presented each December.[70]

Personal life

Brooks met his ex-wife, the former Jane Hughes, while both were students at the University of Chicago. She converted to Judaism [71] and changed her given name to Sarah.[72] In 2012, Brooks and his wife moved from their home in Bethesda, Maryland, to the Cleveland Park neighborhood of Northwest Washington, D.C., where they purchased a home.[73] Brooks said during a February 2015 interview with Brian Lamb that he and his wife are divorced.[74]

According to The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, in a September 2014 interview with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Brooks revealed that his oldest son serves in the Israel Defense Forces.[75]

Select bibliography

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 "David Brooks Biography". PBS NewsHour. Archived from the original on Dec 20, 2011.
  2. ↑ "David Brooks." Contemporary Authors Online. Detroit: Gale, 2012. Biography In Context. Web. November 7, 2013.
  3. ↑ "David Brooks." Gale Biography in Context. Detroit: Gale, 2011. Biography In Context. Web. November 7, 2013.
  4. ↑ Eberstadt, Mary (ed.), "Why I turned right: leading baby boom conservatives chronicle their political journeys," Simon and Schuster (2007).
  5. 1 2 Columnist Biography: David Brooks, The New York Times
  6. 1 2 Felsenthal, Carol (May 18, 2015). "David Brooks Doesn't Pay Attention to Your Criticism". Retrieved February 14, 2016.
  7. ↑ It's Back, The Weekly Standard, February 20, 2003
  8. ↑ A Loud and Promised Land, New York Times, April 16, 2009. "As an American Jew, I was taught to go all gooey-eyed at the thought of Israel..."
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Beam, Christopher (Jul 4, 2010). "A Reasonable Man". New York magazine. Retrieved November 14, 2014. His wife is devoutly Jewish—she converted after they married and recently changed her name from Jane Hughes to the more biblical-sounding Sarah Brooks—but he rarely attends synagogue.
  10. ↑ University of Chicago Maroon, April 5, 1983.
  11. ↑ "Everybody's a Critic", Mary Ruth Yoe, University of Chicago Magazine(February, 2004).
  12. ↑ Random House website The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character and Achievement.
  13. ↑ Brooks, David (January 17, 2011). "Social Animal How the new sciences of human nature can help make sense of a life". The New Yorker. Retrieved March 13, 2011.
  14. ↑ "The Social Animal by David Brooks - Book - eBook - Audiobook". Random House. Retrieved January 22, 2012.
  15. ↑ Bell, Douglas (March 11, 2011). "The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character, and Achievement, by David Brooks". The Globe and Mail. Toronto.
  16. ↑ "The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character, and Achievement | Books Inc. - The West's Oldest Independent Bookseller". Books Inc. Retrieved January 22, 2012.
  17. ↑ Nagel, Thomas (March 11, 2011). "David Brooks's Theory of Human Nature". The New York Times. Retrieved March 13, 2011.
  18. ↑ Myers, PZ (March 11, 2011). "David Brooks' dream world for the trust-fund set". Salon.com. Retrieved March 16, 2011.
  19. ↑ Wilkinson, Will (March 10, 2011). "The Social Animal by David Brooks: A Scornful Review". Forbes.com. Retrieved March 16, 2011.
  20. ↑ Brooks, David. "The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character, and Achievement (9781400067602): David Brooks: Books". Amazon.com. Retrieved January 22, 2012.
  21. ↑ "Publishers Weekly Best-sellers". The Maui News. April 3, 2011. Retrieved April 4, 2011.
  22. ↑ Brooks, David (February 4, 2007). "Children of Polarization". The New York Times.
  23. ↑ Harrington, Rebecca (December 19, 2012). "David Brooks To Teach 'Humility' At Yale". The Huffington Post.
  24. ↑ Wood, Becky (June 15, 2012). "Five new members elected to University of Chicago Board of Trustees". Retrieved February 13, 2016.
  25. ↑ "Board of Advisors". The University of Chicago Institute of Politics. Retrieved February 13, 2016.
  26. ↑ David Warren, A War Between Two World Views July 17, 2009
  27. 1 2 Howard Kurtz, "David Brooks, Riling Up the Right" The Daily Beast September 30, 2012
  28. 1 2 3 Weiland, Noah (October 4, 2013). "Uncommon Interview: David Brooks (A.B. '83)". The Chicago Maroon. Retrieved February 13, 2016.
  29. ↑ Yoe, Mary Ruth (February 2004). "Everybody's a critic". University of Chicago Magazine. 96 (3). Retrieved September 11, 2009.
  30. ↑ Brooks, David (March 9, 2003). "The Certainty Crisis". The Weekly Standard. Retrieved February 17, 2015.
  31. ↑ Brooks, David (April 28, 2003). "The Collapse of the Dream Palaces". The Weekly Standard. Retrieved February 17, 2015.
  32. ↑ David Brooks, The Harry da Reid Code, New York Times (November 3, 2005).
  33. ↑ Jonathan Chait, Was the Iraq War a Crime or a Mistake? Yes., New York (May 18, 2008).
  34. ↑ Greg Mitchell, David Brooks: No Apologies 5 Years Later (March 25, 2008).
  35. 1 2 3 4 David Brooks, Learning From Mistakes, New York Times (May 19, 2015).
  36. ↑ Brooks, David (July 3, 2007). "Ending the Farce". New York Times. Retrieved March 11, 2011.
  37. ↑ Sullivan, Andrew (July 3, 2007). "What Rule of Law?". Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved March 11, 2011.
  38. ↑ Brooks, David (August 10, 2006). "Party No. 3". The New York Times. Retrieved February 16, 2009.
  39. ↑ Shea, Danny (October 8, 2008). "David Brooks: Sarah Palin "Represents A Fatal Cancer To The Republican Party"". Huffington Post. Retrieved February 16, 2009.
  40. ↑ David Brooks: Sarah Palin Is A 'Joke', TPMTv on YouTube, November 15, 2009
  41. 1 2 "In Depth with David Brooks". C-SPAN. December 4, 2011. Retrieved April 25, 2015. (Palin comments) Host: DOES DAVID REGRET HIS COMMENT ABOUT SARAH PALIN AND HER CANCER ON THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? Guest: YEAH, I DO. I THINK IT WAS SOME LUNCH AFFAIR FOR SOME MAGAZINE, AND I WAS JUST MOUTHING OFF, AND SO I -- I'M NOT A FAN OF HERS, BUT THAT'S A LITTLE STRONG. (Opinion on Obama) I THINK HE'S CONDUCTED HIMSELF IN PRETTY MUCH AN HONEST WAY. HE'S HAD VERY LITTLE CORRUPTION. I STILL HAVE GREAT PERM ADMIRATION FOR HIM. I'M MORE TO HIS RIGHT, BUT I GIVE HIM NO WORSE THAN A B-. I THINK HE'S MADE SOME MISTAKES, BUT I WOULDN'T SAY HE'S BEEN A BAD PRESIDENT.
  42. ↑ Brooks, David (March 3, 2007). "No U-Turns". The New York Times. Retrieved September 13, 2008.
  43. ↑ Pareene, Alex. "Blow up the Times Op-Ed page, and start again!". Salon. Retrieved August 15, 2015.
  44. ↑ Sherman, Gabriel (August 31, 2009). "The Courtship: The story behind the Obama-Brooks bromance". The New Republic. Retrieved September 11, 2009.
  45. ↑ Brooks, David (October 19, 2006). "Run, Barack, Run". The New York Times. Retrieved September 11, 2009.
  46. ↑ "I Miss Barack Obama". The New York Times. February 9, 2016.
  47. 1 2 3 Brooks, David (January 12, 2010). "The Tel Aviv Cluster". The New York Times.
  48. ↑ Maltz Bovy, Phoebe. "David Brooks Was Right: Anti-Semitism Is a Different Evil". The New Republic. Retrieved August 15, 2015.
  49. 1 2 Brooks, David (May 1, 2015). "The Nature of Poverty". The New York Times.
  50. 1 2 Schwartz, Ian (June 11, 2016). "David Brooks: People Will Be Sick Of Trump And Vote For Hillary, "She Will be Competent And Normal"". Retrieved September 20, 2016.
  51. 1 2 PBS News Hour. "Shields and Brooks on ‘anticlimactic’ Clinton victory, Trump’s ‘moral chasm’." Online video clip. YouTube. YouTube, 10 June 2016. Web. 20 September 2016.
  52. ↑ Brooks, David (18 March 2016). "No, Not Trump, Not Ever". New York Times. Retrieved 20 September 2016.
  53. ↑ New York Times, April 17, 2005, 4-14
  54. ↑ New York Times, November 22, 2003, A-15
  55. ↑ Brooks, David (April 22, 2007). "Postures in Public, Facts in the Womb". The New York Times. Retrieved December 31, 2009.
  56. ↑ Brooks, David (January 2, 2014). "Weed: Been There. Done That". The New York Times.
  57. ↑ Scocca, Tom. "David Brooks Has Some Notions About the Programs on Your Television Machine". Slate. Retrieved August 15, 2015.
  58. ↑ Scocca, Tom. "David Brooks Is Nostalgic for a World Without Himself in It". Slate. Retrieved August 15, 2015.
  59. ↑ Issenberg, Sasha. "Boo-Boos in Paradise". Philadelphia magazine. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
  60. ↑ Zweig, David. "The facts vs. David Brooks: Startling inaccuracies raise questions about his latest book". Salon. Retrieved August 15, 2015.
  61. ↑ Kinsley, Michael. "Suburban Thrall". New York Times. Retrieved November 14, 2014.
  62. ↑ Scocca, Tom. "David Brooks Has Noticed Hillary Is a Soviet Dictator". Gawker. Retrieved August 15, 2015.
  63. ↑ Lowery, Annie (1 May 2015). "David Brooks Is Not Buying Your Excuses, Poor People". New York Magazine. Retrieved 20 September 2016.
  64. ↑ Illing, Sean (1 May 2015). "Why David Brooks Shouldn't Talk About Poor People". Slate. Retrieved 20 September 2016.
  65. 1 2 Taranto, James. "Brooks Borks Cruz", Wall Street Journal (January 12, 2016).
  66. ↑ Brooks, David. "The Brutalism of Ted Cruz", New York Times (January 12, 2016).
  67. ↑ Dretke v. Haley, 541 U.S. 386 (2004).
  68. ↑ Althouse, Ann. "Althouse" (January 13, 2016).
  69. ↑ Denniston, Lyle. "Constitution Check: Did the Supreme Court give us Super PACs?", Constitution Daily (May 7, 2012).
  70. ↑ Brooks, David (December 29, 2005). "The Sidney Awards, 2005". The New York Times. Retrieved December 30, 2014.
  71. ↑ "The Times' 'New York Conservative'". The Jewish Week.
  72. ↑ Brooks, Sarah (June 19, 2008). "What's in a name? In part, my religion". Washington Jewish Week.
  73. ↑ Post on Brooks's 2012 purchase of a new home in The Washington Post
  74. ↑ "Q&A with David Brooks". C-SPAN, February 8, 2015, 40:45. (2 40:45) Lamb: Let me ask you, as I was doing research I kept running into the story, Is David Brooks divorced or not? Brooks: I am divorced. I do not want legally talk about it but I am divorced.
  75. ↑ "David Brooks' Son Is In the Israeli Army: Does It Matter?". Jewish Journal. September 23, 2014. Retrieved September 25, 2014.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to David Brooks (journalist).
Wikiquote has quotations related to: David Brooks (journalist)
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the 12/2/2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.